I'm concerned that there's a worse problem. How do we, those of us who refuse to be ruled, coexist in a world where the vast majority of people want to be ruled?
That's what the whole election process is about after all, correct? It gives all those people the illusion of picking their rulers.
Even if given the chance to vote for liberty, I don't believe the majority of people would. We'd be better off creating a different model. We saw what happened to Ron Paul for example. He was just doing what he did to point out the obvious and to further the message. Did he have any realistic hope of winning? I doubt it.
Still, trolling the establishment would be worth it. Anything we can do to further the message of liberty is worth it. We just need to understand that we are surrounded by people incapable of being self-ruled. They will demand a ruler.
Can we change enough people to make them refuse a ruler? Man, I don't know. That's... asking a lot.
RE: A New Dallas Accord to Unify The Freedom Movement