I just added many more bots, many of those curation guild bots that vote on the guild members.
This is a community. It primarily votes on community members. So, not adding it would be discriminatory.
Moonbot is a bot to which you can subscribe for 4 Steem and it will give you 40 cents votes on your posts.
A bot run by steemit witness ausitbank.
Aussie bot. Votes on 200 plus aussies. Run by ausitbank.
It is a curation guild. In their own words:
Steemsquad is an initiative of multiple minnows whose objective is to promote diverse and quality content and their work which may not have a chance to get noticed when published in the main streem. STEEMSQUAD initiative will try to tweak the game to equally distribute the wealth among its members.
Run by a steemit witness. Anyone can get votes from it by visiting steemgigs discord server's post-promotion channel.
Has automated steemvoter rules set to vote for specific users.
I routinely monitor the new posts and check if they are using any bots or not. If I find them, I keep track of them and when I find enough bots (about 6-10), I add them to the list and fork. This is to ensure no one is able to get extra votes by using bots.
Actually, using bots in steem is perfectly normal. But using them in posts someone published via Utopian is not perceived positively.
Update: Added more bots. "businessbot", "themanualbot", "stackin" and "steem-untalented". Stackin is selling votes.
Open Source Contribution posted via Utopian.io