daodejing

I created a spreadsheet in which I intentionally solved for the minimum groups of 5 for any number of participants. I found that, for group sizes 20-102, it was possible to have the percentage of people

Good work, Shakhruz. I clicked on both of the videos to confirm I couldn't understand them. :) Same goes for most of your folks if they tried to watch our videos, though. So it's super-cool you're doing

Great analysis, Matt. Thank you for doing this! Since I don't know the data as well as you, I don't think I can easily extrapolate this. But my sense is that, as the meeting size starts to climb past 50,

@jamesmart, @doingitright, @mattlangston, @shakhruz, @daodejing, @westreich

@daodejing, @jamesmart, @westreich, @hachtu, @cacxyz, @maximcincinnatis

@recentchats, @pnc, @cvrizzos108x, @dphillippi, @daodejing

@cvrizzos108x, @daodejing, @shakhruz, @machnbirdsparo, @nudimar, @drew-bop

Did this room only have 4 people? If so, can someone explain why that happened?

@aguerrido, @dan, @dansingjoy, @novacryptollc, @daodejing

@aguerrido, @thomashallgren, @val, @lionflash, @daodejing

@daodejing, @fractallymike, @zeos, @gonflosca, @cacxyz, @sebata

@dan, @fractallymike, @val, @daodejing, @cryptokens, @recentchats

@daodejing, @marconamaste, @w3max, @thenewlegend, @mototbilisi

@dan, @doingitright, @jamesmart, @daodejing, @bishop3dcrea, @berliangor

@merivercap, @jseymour, @berliangor, @daodejing, @drew-bop, @hahn.ryu

@val, @thomashallgren, @stan, @daodejing, @douglasjames

@thomashallgren, @dphillippi, @val, @daodejing, @gonflosca

@fractallymike, @mattlangston, @hachtu, @drwu, @daodejing, @khoja

@dansingjoy, @tmess, @hachtu, @daodejing, @recentchats, @dan1am

@shakhruz, @daodejing, @amih, @sim31, @mikelennie, @zeos