half-fast

The context of your comment implied fiat as money as used colloquially. That part I addressed as a persona pet peeve. Hence, why it wasn't included in the TLDR version of my comment, that I merely neglected

Fiat currency isn't money, fiat digits (debit cards) even less so. currency != money. Historically, gold and silver are money., and they're retaining their values pretty well. Now that I got that out of

Yes, I'm talking about the one that was in place when I came in; I reckon about half way through the Untamed set. Pretty sure it was 2022. Lots of people were glad when that went away, myself included.

That didn't work very well and did more harm than good LAST TIME it was tried. What makes anyone think it would be any different this time?

The closer this comes and the more I think about it, Splinterlands seems to be heading in a bad direction for players and heading away from the crypto ethos. I believe I'm going to stop buying new packs

Thanks for the giveaway! Same account

I'd still rather see the lazy tax part of the system changed to a staking or fee system for bonuses and services provided by the castles and keeps. That would allow those running the plots to voluntarily

Now that we have soul-bound reward cards, those might make good novice leader-board prizes that bots wouldn't want to farm, but would help new players build something they could later play with in bronze.

And you think that's not considered when setting the price?

This might help SL's back end,but I predict a decline in use of the rental market given that the fees would have to be calculated into the rental prices.

The premise of the idea isn't bad. However, the proposed implementation leaves a bit to be desired. The issues I see are: The team's SPS are not the DAO's SPS; so it doesn't seem right to demand that of

Now this is a good proposal! Showing the function of the DAO in a way that doesn't even have a hint of catering to the top at the expense of the bottom is an excellent approach. I just hope the Splinterlands

Sorry, but this seems like this has more ramifications than simply reduce staking gains by 6.5% but would also skew the voting system even more than it already is. Given that most of the proposals to this

If your goal is to shrink your player base by spitting on anyone who isn't in a position to afford max levels for a league; then this is a very good way to go about it!

Planned Parenthood has always been about destroying kids. They're merely expanding their age range and methods.

That last bit was funny; "It's that the private sector hasn't grown enough." Not like onerous and superfluous regulations creating barriers to entry and raising the cost of starting virtually

"Please man, stop! I'm addicted to giveaways and need to go to rehab." "Please man, stop! I'm addicted to giveaways and need to go to rehab." "Please man, stop! I'm addicted to

It's a shame that the terms "boob tube" and the term I still use "idiot box" aren't as commonly heard as they used to be.

It's nice to see someone else who gets it. The times I've tried to explain this I've either been a "Nazi bigot", (or some variation,) or some variation on commie, retard, or other things. If

"Please man, stop! I'm addicted to giveaways and need to go to rehab."