mattockfs

Created a funding-token on hive-engine for funding the coinZdense project

On the updated coinZdense quantum-secure hash-based signature format.

Intro to the Fluree Schema Scenatio Tool (fsst) for FlureeDB, and a walkthrough of the dockertest fsst subcommand.

A technical walkthrough of Simple-Post-Quantum-Signatures (spq-sigs)

Some updates on HIVE quantum resistance.

Discussing hash based signatures and the first steps towards making HIVE post-quantum ready. Please weigh in.

Top ten factors for picking a solid altcoin portfolio. Thug factor, Ninja mining, Quantum resistance, and more.

HIVE-Ads progress report including accounts/github setup, reading up on escrow & little FlureeDB side-chain experiment.

If you follow my @mattockfs account, you might have seen my post proposing a peer advertising system for HIVE. I haven't started coding yet. First I'm working on updating and completing the design (I'l

Those of you still folowing @pibarabot may remember this account used to post flag-war visualizations back when this blockchain was still called STEEM. I hope this doesn't come as a disappointment, but

Outline: Rewarding top-content providers with add revenues. A possible first step towards HIVE as second level protocol.

Today, in a few hours, my @pibara account, my oldest account on the HIVE blockchain will be exactly thee years. It have been a quite vibrant three years, and while the interaction with many of you have

If you are a Python developer and by chance you have been using either the Python 2 asyncsteem library, or the alpha stage Python 2+3 txjsonrpcqueue library, a little heads up. Because of the STEEM blockchain

Bit on the good past. It's been quite a while since I've spent any real time developing for the STEEM platform. Those of you following my alter ego, @pibara might remember @croupierbot. You might remember

With HF21 if you are a minnow or dolphin, up voting a comment on your post will either mean no longer reaching dust level with even a 100% up vote, or if you do reach the dust level, it will likely mean the economic value will only be slightly over half of the value it would have up voting a regular post instead. As such, up voting of comments will become less attractive and as a result, commenting on posts, previously a prime source of slow initial growth for red fish accounts will become less attractive. There is a way around this. Using a [comment-vote accumulator](https://steemit.com/commentrewards/@pibara/using-a-comment-vote-accumulator). Would you consider using a comment-vote accumulator post when commenting on posts? Would you up vote such accumulator posts? Or do you feel using a comment-vote accumulator is a form of abuse and should lead to down votes of people who use them?

With the upcoming hard fork, and part of the hard fork posing as economic improvement measures, it is easy to get lost in mostly irrelevant (from an economical perspective) details of reward curves,

I like the idea of steem-engine in general and PALNET specifically as an interesting testing ground for the future of STEEM. With bid-bots already maing their way into the steem-engine ecosystem, we are

SteemSende-EU is still far from ready for usage, but one of the things I am working on is a smallish airdrop for the STEEMSENSE airdrop. The prime goal for STEEMSENSE is to be a token for buying advertising

Hello みなさま!~ ¡Hola a todos!~ Wenas, wenas, yo de nuevo, este cap no tiene ilustración pero el siguiente si. Sé que ultimamente he estado medio ausente pero es que se me han alineados los planetas y pues

<center> <img src="http://www.steemsense.eu/steemsense.png" width="50"> </center> I am currently testing with some code for the @steemsense-eu proof of concept. SteemSense-EU is to become a proof of concept for a bid-based revenue sharing STEEM-burning advertising platform for STEEM. The current idea is that STEEM will be the primary currency for the platform for any non-STEEM advertiser. If there is a lack of bids, something that is likely to often be the case during project start-up, the top STEEM/SBD burning *promoted* post for shall receive free auto-generated-banner ad displays for each primary tag. A one [STEEMSENSE](https://steem-engine.com/?p=market&t=STEEMSENSE) a day reward pool shall be set aside to be divided amongst non-advertiser-funded click through facilitators and /or users of the STEEM promoted feature. That is, untill the max supply of 1,000 STEEMSENSE is reached. I've currently made 1% (10 STEEMSENSE) available on [steem-engine](https://steem-engine.com/?p=market&t=STEEMSENSE) in an attempt to maybe get some funding for my project. Mostly to be able to allocate more time to the project and speed things up. I also would like to spent about 1% (10 STEEMSENSE) in an airdrop, mainly to get some attention for the project. What do you think, from a marketing perspective would be the best way to do the one time 10 STEEMSENSE airdrop? And what do you feel is the best way to spent the daily 1 STEEMSENSE reward pool?