pandasquad

Is this proposal still valid? And if so this proposal will invalidate it?

What pool will the funds be added to? USDC:DEC v2? USDC:DEC v3? If v3 please state price ranges and fee %

Deliberately underproviding liquidity to drive up arbitrage is an interesting idea I've not come across before. On low fee hive that might work, on fee chains the fee would surely eat the tiny rewards.

Based on your own analysis this is the 2nd best value for money pool for the DAO (SPS per $Vol). Why should we cut the best value for money pool? Where will extra inflation go now?

I think worth a vote on but the DAO has less than $0.6million stables ( The other $2.4m will need to come from SPS sales. That is like 80 million SPS, IF SPS is $0.03. This would surely crash SPS, meaning

Why does SR increase so fast? And if I contribute just 1 DC to the pool SR goes down slightly (or just stays level) but if I contribute 0 the next day because I forget 2.5 days of SR is added? Seems can

😂

2xDiamond is definitely more

It doesn't mean you will earn half, your multiplier will be 5x not 10x. If everyone's multiplier is less than you can expect more SPS in chests, so you may actually earn more in $ terms. You can also earn

I fully agree, for to long rewards have been over printed and also very strong in battles. Rewards are still being overprinted and are still very strong in battle. This causes core sets to lose value and

Agree, it's just making things complicated more than achieving any actual goal

My main issue is this is quite complicated. People with soulbound still have to pay for the actual land and the actual DEC they stake on it. If they have 100 accounts with 43/86 soulbound cards on they

But if we hold those stables and the company has issues they can be a safety net, or a safety net for any other event. If it is in DEC it is unstable and low liquidity and would provide a very small, if

Those funds not only give the DAO financial security and independence of the game but also protection from other wider crypto and economic events. We would lose that security and risk the DAOs future for

Similar yes

In your own reply you have quoted 'a chance'

Card Sales should not expire. There are cards historically listed at high prices but owners MIA. During the next bull these cards will be needed! Please rethink this bit!

The down side it very powerful cards (which there always is) will be focused on and have relatively higher print numbers and there will be a supply imbalance. That being said with them axing all in print

Yes, this idea seems to satisfy both the people voting for this and those saying they should allow purchasing buildings earlier instead, wish they saw this before launching this proposal

This is in itself a massive change to the land whitepaper I agree. I do think (subjective opinion) however the majority of players prefer guaranteed airdrop cards, even if it does inflate supply. This