Hi Everyone,
The responses to Covid-19 by many Governments around the world have been appalling and disastrous in so many ways. The most damaging response of them all has been the Covid-19 jabs. Everything about Covid-19 was built on lies. These lies relate to:
- the origin of the SARS-CoV2 virus (the virus that supposedly caused the Covid-19 disease)
- the symptoms and severity of the symptoms
- the medical response to the symptoms
- the response to stop the spread
- the development of vaccines
In this post, I discuss the lies and deceit spread about Covid-19 by Governments, “medical experts”, pharmaceutical companies, and the mainstream media. However, the main focus of this post is the so-called Covid-19 vaccines. The so-called Covid-19 vaccines might be the biggest and most dangerous lie in human history.
Lies about the Origin of Covid-19
The origin of the SARS-CoV2 virus has never been confirmed. The mainstream media initially supported the story that the virus started in a ‘wet market’ in Wuhan, China (Euro News). They speculated that the virus began in bats and was passed on through other animals before eventually infecting humans (Guardian). Any other alternative theories were treated as misinformation or conspiracy theory. One theory that was labelled as such was that the virus originated in the laboratory in Wuhan. A year later, the laboratory theory was given some credence by the mainstream media. The National Institute of Health (NIH) admitted to conducting gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Laboratory. This admission was contrary to what was claimed by Dr. Fauci (the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President) (Daily Mail).
There is also the argument that SARS-CoV2 virus never existed. Therefore, Covid-19 is also a work of fiction. There are doubts by some doctors and medical experts (Sally Fallon Morell, MA, Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD, and Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD) that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified. Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD outlines the steps necessary to isolate a new virus. He claims that no evidence has been presented to suggest that this has been for the SARS-CoV2 virus.
Exaggeration and Lies about Severity of Disease
In January 2020, the mainstream media claimed people in Wuhan were collapsing because of Covid-19 (Daily Mail). However, several months later once Covid-19 had spread to the rest of the world, the reports of people collapsing no longer appeared in the media. There was misinformation and fearmongering from the very beginning. The mainstream media reported about Covid-19 almost non-stop for months. They portrayed Covid-19 like it was the deadliest pandemic in centuries. In reality, the death rate from Covid-19 has been proven to be very low. Even if we include the elderly and people with existing serious conditions, the average death rate from Covid-19 is below 1% (CDC). Many of the deaths recorded were of people who died with Covid-19 rather than because of Covid-19. The median age of deaths with Covid-19 has been consistently above the average life expectancy (Daily Mail).
Poor and/or Negligent Medical Response to the Symptoms of Covid-19
Even though the likelihood of death because of Covid-19 is low, the number of recorded deaths have been high. These numbers may have been inflated by the medical or lack of medical response to the disease. This is particularly true in regards to elderly people.
Ventilators
Covid-19 patients that are struggling to breathe are often put on ventilators when other forms of respiratory support could have been used. The use of ventilators could be causing more harm than good if used when not necessary. As patients are unconscious, they are unable to fight the sensation of being unable to breathe (Stat). According to a New York study, 88% of Covid-19 patients put on ventilators died. This is considerably higher than the usual death rate (estimated between 40% and 50%) (Health Day). The excessive use of ventilators created a shortage of ventilators which prevented the patients that needed them the most from using them.
Existing Treatments
Covid-19 symptoms can be treated with existing drugs such as Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and even vitamin D. However, the use of these drugs were deliberately suppressed. The mainstream media pushed a false narrative that Hydroxychloroquine was dangerous to use on Covid-19 patients despite being proven to be safe in other usage.
The use of Hydroxychloroquine was shown to reduce the chances that Covid-19 would progress to more serious disease (Global research). Ivermectin has been ridiculed as a drug for horses and cows despite being approved for human consumption by the FDA for treating conditions caused by parasites (Zero Hedge). Treatment studies for Ivermectin show that it can significantly decrease mortality, hospitalisations, ICU, and cases (Covid-19 Treatment Studies).
Studies have shown that higher levels of Vitamin D can reduce chances of mortality from Covid-19. Likewise, Vitamin D deficiency has shown higher levels of mortality from Covid-19 (AOL). Therefore, Vitamin D could have been used as a treatment for Covid-19. Covid-19 Treatment Studies confirms some improvement across many areas such as mortality and hospitalisation. None of the above was recommended by Government, media, and their selected experts. Instead, they imposed lockdowns, which would have kept more people in their homes; thus, reducing their absorption of Vitamin D.
Care Homes
Possibly the most disturbing attempt to exaggerate the severity of Covid-19 was the treatment of people in care homes.
Between 2 March and 12 June 2020, 18,562 residents of care homes in England died with COVID-19, including 18,168 people aged 65 and over, representing almost 40% of all deaths involving COVID-19 in England during this period. Of these deaths, 13,844 (76%) happened in care homes themselves; nearly all of the remainder occurred in a hospital. During the same period, 28,186 “excess deaths” were recorded in care homes in England, representing a 46% increase compared with the same period in previous years.
Source: Amnesty International
During the above mention period, hospitals moved large numbers of elderly patients into care homes (NHS). Disabled and elderly Covid-19 patients were put on ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ orders by NHS staff (Expose). The Quality Care Commission admitted that disabled people were denied access to critical care. Amnesty International discuss in a 52 page report, how the elderly were denied a basic level of care. For example, ambulances were not called for people considered ‘end-of-life’.
Midazolam
The most concerning development relates to the drug Midazolam (used for end-of-life care). The usage of the drug doubled in April 2020 compared with normal usage (The Expose and The Sun).
There appears to be a correlation between the use of Midazolam and death rates; this is most noticeable in over 80 year olds (The Expose). See Figure 1.
Figure 1: Death Rates and Midazolam Prescriptions (UK)
Source: Expose
The same comparison can be made with the number of care home deaths. See Figure 2.
Figure 2: Death Rates in Care Home and Midazolam Prescriptions (UK)
Source: The Bernician
Care home deaths are not unique to just the UK. Similar high rates occurred during the early spikes in Covid-19 deaths in the USA (CNN), Canada (Medical Express), and the European Union (Guardian). It is possible that the elderly and disabled were targeted in these countries as well.
Lies about the Need for Restrictions
In 2020 and 2021, many Governments around the world imposed strict restrictions on their people. These restrictions included:
- Lockdowns (partial and/or full)
- Social distancing
- Mask wearing in public
- Curfews
- Forced testing for Covid-19
- Restrictions on most forms of travel
- Restrictions to working and work environment
- Social isolation (people in care homes were not allowed visitors)
- School closures
- Restriction on access to General Practitioners
These restrictions came at a massive cost (economics and social) but they were claimed to be for the benefit of people’s health as these measures were claimed to stop the spread of Covid-19. According to a study conducted by the Johns Hopkins University, the Covid-19 restrictions reduced Covid-19 mortalities by an estimated 0.2% in the USA and Europe (MSN). This tiny reduction in mortalities is a clear indication that the restrictions failed.
Launch of the “Vaccines”
The moment World Health Organisation (WHO) declared Covid-19 a pandemic, work was announced on developing vaccines. Vaccines were treated as the only way out of the “deadly” Covid-19 pandemic. All other possible treatments were dismissed despite reported success by thousands of doctors from around the world (Precision Vaccinations). In under a year, the first few “vaccines” were developed and approved under emergency use authorization (EUA). In some countries the vaccination program was launched before the end of 2020. For example, the UK vaccination program was launched on 8 December 2020 (France24). The mainstream media promoted the vaccines as a huge success the day they were launched. They even named the vaccination launch day as V-Day (reference to the end of World War 2 in Europe) (ITV News).
These vaccines were claimed to be the miracle that would end the Covid-19 pandemic (i.e. imposed suffering caused by Government restrictions). That was not to be the case. For many countries, restrictions were implemented for all of 2021 and part of 2022. The vaccines were making very little positive difference despite the high percentage of people being vaccinated. Instead of admitting the vaccines were infective, Government and mainstream media insisted people start taking booster shots of the vaccine. These jabs could be taken as frequently as every 3 months (Guardian).
Mainstream media started to blame people who had not taken the Covid-19 vaccines, derogatorily referred to as the ‘unvaccinated’, for the continued spread of Covid-19. These claims were supported by ‘Fact Checkers’ (Fact Check). Governments took action against people who had not taken the Covid-19 vaccines (‘the unvaccinated’) with the use of Covid-19 passports/certificates/health passes. These new forms of Covid-19 documentation, often digital, were becoming a requirement in many countries around the world (Schengenvisa news). These documents prevented the people who had not taken the vaccine from living a normal life. Many workplaces even required their employees to take the vaccine or they would be forced to be continually tested or even lose their jobs.
The entire vaccine narrative was a lie. The so called ‘vaccines’ were not vaccines at all. They were ineffective at preventing people catching Covid-19. They did not stop serious illness; people continued to die despite being vaccinated. Any effectiveness they may have had waned after a few months; hence, the need for booster shots. They did not prevent people from spreading Covid-19 to other people; this was the entire premise for the Covid-19 vaccine documentation. Pfizer have admitted that they did not even test their vaccine to determine whether it would stop the transmission of Covid-19 (News).
According to the Health and Human Services (HHS), vaccines provide immunity to serious diseases without the risk of serious illness, vaccines protect people who were not vaccinated through community immunity, and in many cases immunity lasts a lifetime. The proclaimed Covid-19 vaccines have not successfully achieved any of the above. Therefore, we cannot call them vaccines. It does not appear that theses jabs were ever even intended to be vaccines.
Negative Effects of the Jabs
The jabs are not just ineffective against Covid-19 but have also caused considerable harm to millions of people around the world. VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System built from HHS data, it has captured some of the harm caused by vaccines. The numbers reported in the system are suspected to account for only 1% of vaccine injuries (OpenVaers). Figure 3 contains some of the most reported and severe vaccine injuries and Figure 4 compares the number of vaccine deaths from 1990 to 2022 and also contains a graph of the number of days that death occurs after the onset of disease.
Figure 3: Reported Vaccine Injuries caused by Covid-19
Figure 4: Reported vaccine Deaths (1990 – 2022) and Deaths to Onset
Source: OpenVaers
Note: Actual numbers could be 100 times higher than the ones reported in the above data.
The Expose believe the number of Covid-19 jab related deaths could be as high 20 million and the number of injuries could be over 2 billion. They draw these conclusions based on data collected by VAERS and EUDRA. They factored in underreporting (used a factor of 40) and the portion of doses used in the USA and EU (this is about 1/8th of the doses administered around the world).
Athletes
Since the rollout of the jabs there has been a sharp increase in the number of athletes dying. It was typically rare for athletes to suddenly drop dead. They need to be in good physical health to be competitive in the sports they play. However, there are frequent reports of athletes collapsing during competitions. Some of them recover and some of them die. Figure 5 shows the rapid increase in the number athletes collapsing and dying. Figure 6 compares the monthly average recorded athlete deaths between 1966 and 2004 with January 2021 to April 2022.
Figure 5: Number of athletes collapsing and/or Dying (January 2021 to April 2022)
Figure 6: Monthly Average Recorded Athlete Deaths 1966 to 2004 vs. January 2021 to April 2022
Source: The Expose
Note: The Expose has a list of all the athletes that died during this period
It is not just athletes suddenly dying. People that we would expect to be perfectly healthy are dying or becoming permanently sick. Pilots are dying in mid-air, thus causing planes to divert (International Fly Guy). Women are having more miscarriages and stillbirths. This is causing birth rates to noticeably drop in many countries with high Covid-19 jab rates (Global Research). Figure 7 contains an example of the fall in birth rates in Australia.
Figure 7: Australian Birth Rates (2015 -2021)
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) cited by World Freedom Alliance
Children
Healthy children were not at risk of serious illness or death from Covid-19. In a November article, the National Child Mortality Database estimated the child mortality rate from Covid-19 to be 0.0002%. Despite being virtually no risk to children. Governments have insisted that children should also be given the jab. A common argument used, was that it would stop the spread of Covid-19 to more vulnerable people. As mentioned earlier in this post, this argument was a lie as the jabs do not stop transmission of Covid-19. In October 2022, the CDC added the Covid-19 mRNA jabs to the childhood vaccine schedule (The Aquilar Report). This has been done as a way of jabbing as many young children as possible. If children are not jabbed, they might not be allowed to attend schools (ABC News).
The jabs are causing considerable harm to children. According to a study by JAMMA, children under the age of 5 suffered various side-effects from the mRNA jabs. The Daily Sceptic unpacks the study to explain that it revealed that approximately 1 in 500 children under the age of 5 required hospitalisation after taking the jab. A study published in the Journal of Paediatrics indicated that 12 to 17 year olds who were given 2 doses of the Pfizer mRNA jab were more at risk from suffering heart abnormalities.
As children receive more Covid-19 jabs, the risks increase. Figure 8 contains the mortality rates for children in England based on the number of doses of the Covid-19 jabs.
Figure 8: Mortality rates by vaccination status per 100,000 person-years, England, Children Aged 10 to 14 (1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022)
Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS) cited by The Expose
National Statistics
The number of deaths caused by the jabs are significantly large that they have become noticeable in national death statistics. There have been an excess number of deaths above the 5-year average for every week between April and October in 2022 (5-year average is higher because it includes 2020 and 2021 data). Figure 9 contains the number of deaths (Covid-19 related and unrelated) for 2020 to 2022.
Figure 9: Deaths and 5 year average for Deaths in the UK (January 2020 to October 2022)
Source: ONS cited by The Sceptic
The high number of deaths are not unique to the UK. More than 30 of the 38 OECD countries had higher than normal excess deaths in the first 10 months of 2022. Figure 10 shows the estimated number of excess deaths in OECD countries.
Figure 10: Excess Deaths across the 38 OECD countries for 2022 up until November.
Sources: OECD Stat and The Expose
Booster Jabs
There appears to be a correlation between Covid-19 Spring and Autumn booster jabs and the number of excess deaths. Figure 11 shows data for Spring and Autumn.
Figure 11: Covid-19 Boosters and Excess Deaths 2022
Source: ONS cited by The Sceptic
After the Spring booster jabs, excess deaths increased dramatically. They remained stabilised but remained high throughout the Summer. After the Autumn booster jabs, excess deaths increased again but by a smaller amount before dropping back to the Summer numbers. Figure 12 focuses on the Autumn booster jabs.
Figure 12: Covid-19 Boosters and Excess Deaths September and October 2022
Source: ONS cited by The Sceptic
V-Safe Program
The evidence clearly shows that the Covid-19 jabs are causing death and serious illness to many people. The number of deaths are easier to quantify as there is more data available. To find out more about the non-fatal Covid-19 adverse reactions, we can use data from the Center for Disease Control (CDC).
The CDC created V-Safe, a smartphone-based program, to collect health assessments after Covid-19 vaccination. Approximately 10 million people signed-up and submitted health reports after Covid-19 vaccination (ICAN). The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sued the CDC to release the data they had collected from the 10 million people who participated in V-Safe. See Figure 13 for a breakdown of the data.
Figure 13: Summary of Results from CDC Adverse Health Impacts presented by ICAN
Source: CDC cited by ICAN
Approximately 1/3 of participants were negatively affected by the vaccine (i.e. unable to do normal activities (1.2 million), missed time from work or school (1.3 million), or required medical care (0.8 million)). If we extrapolate these numbers to the billions that have been vaccinated, we are likely to have billions of people with Covid-19 jab injuries and hundreds of millions of people harmed to the extent they required medical care.
Low Unemployment
Many countries around the world are experiencing some of the lowest levels of unemployment in recent history. Under normal circumstances, low unemployment is a good thing. In 2022, low unemployment is being caused by the large number of people unable to work because of long-term illness (The Economic Times). The article does not explain what could be causing this long-term illness in so many people (i.e. enough people sick to cause low unemployment during a likely recession). It appears consistent with the number of people reporting illness from the jabs.
Died Suddenly
In November 2022, the documentary Died Suddenly was released. This documentary looked into the rapid increase in the number of deaths around the world. The embalmers interviewed in the documentary shared their shocking findings. They found that many of bodies they were embalming contained huge clots that were blocking the arteries of the deceased. These clots would have been the cause of death. See images below for a sample of what they found.
What is Next?
The media hype around Covid-19 died down in early 2022. They moved their attention to the war in Ukraine. The path of destruction caused by the response to Covid-19 and the jabs continues.
Emily Oster (an economist at Brown University) published an article in the Atlantic asking for Amnesty for all the mistakes made during the Covid-19 pandemic. These mistakes ranged from the lockdowns to the jabs. She claimed that the people that forced these restrictions and vaccines upon us should be forgiven because they had good intentions. The mistakes occurred because Covid-19 was new and we needed to act fast based on limited knowledge.
Pfizer have admitted that their jab was not tested to determine if it could stop transmission (News). Pfizer and Moderna are conducting a study on the long-term risk of Myocarditis from taking their jabs (Global research).
It may seem like we are finally seeing some admittance of wrong doing from the people that have committed or supported the atrocities related to Covid-19. However, this is not truly the case. Most restrictions in most countries came to an end in early 2022 but the jabs are mostly still being promoted by mainstream media and Governments. The Autumn jabs still went ahead.
Covid-19 and future possible pandemics were discussed at the G20 Meeting in Indonesia in November of 2022. It appears Governments still strongly support the use of jabs as well as vaccine passports as a response to pandemics.
Below is Point 23 taken from the G20 Bali Leaders’ Declaration.
We recognize the need for strengthening local and regional health product manufacturing capacities and cooperation as well as sustainable global and regional research and development networks to facilitate better access to vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics (VTDs) globally, especially in developing countries, and underscore the importance of public-private partnership, and technology transfer and knowledge sharing on voluntary and mutually agreed terms. We support the WHO mRNA Vaccine Technology Transfer hub as well as all as the spokes in all regions of the world with the objective of sharing technology and technical know-how on voluntary and mutually agreed terms. We welcome joint research and joint production of vaccines, including enhanced cooperation among developing countries. We acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards and verification methods, under the framework of the IHR (2005), to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognizing digital solutions and non-digital solutions, including proof of vaccinations. We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates.
Source: The White House
The G20 are still calling for proof of vaccination and the use of Covid-19 certificates. They still support mRNA technology in vaccines. What happened with Covid-19 will happen again. They are planning on using the same approach with same types of technology. They plan on responding to pandemics with vaccines. This means new vaccines will be rushed in the same way as the Covid-19 vaccines. These vaccines could be just as ineffective and just as dangerous as the Covid-19 jabs. In Point 22 of the same document, they consider the COVID-19 immunization to be a global public good. There is no acknowledgement of its failings.
As a response to questions raised by the ‘Died Suddenly’ documentary (Died Suddenly Twitter Account), The Chief Science Officer of Full Spectrum Biologics wrote an article/paper regarding the negative effects of the jabs. Below is the abstract from that paper.
This brief review will offer data that may demonstrate that misinformation perpetuated by the anti-vaccination movement may be causing more deaths and side effects from any vaccine. A mini review of published literature has been conducted and found that mental stress clearly causes vasoconstriction and arterial constriction of the blood vessels. Therefore, if subjects are panicked, concerned, stressed or scared of the vaccination, their arteries will constrict and become smaller in and around the time of receiving the vaccine. This biological mechanism (the constriction of veins, arteries and vessels under mental stress) is the most likely cause for where there has been blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, dizziness, fainting, blurred vision, loss of smell and taste that may have been experienced shortly after vaccine administration. The extreme mental stress of the patient could most likely be attributed to the fear mongering and scare tactics used by various anti-vaccination groups.
Source: Raymond D Palmer (Chief Science Officer of Full Spectrum Biologics)
The response pushes the blame onto the people who challenged the safety of the jabs. Despite all the evidence indicating the jabs are dangerous, the health “experts’ continue to lie. They continue to deny accountability for their actions and the enormous harm the jabs are causing.
My Conclusion
The responses to Covid-19 have caused enormous damage to society and the economy. Most of this damage is still to come as major economies could be plunged into years of recessions and high inflation. The Covid-19 jabs have caused the most damage of all. They have destroyed millions of lives and will likely destroy millions more once more people start to experience the long-term effects. The jabs are still being rolled out in many countries. The booster jabs appear as dangerous if not more dangerous than the original jabs.
There is no genuine remorse shown by the people who tried to force their entire country to take this jab. Governments in countries such as New Zealand are still calling people who speak out against the jabs conspiracy theorists and have even labelled them as a threat (News Broadcast posted by Sovryn Media). Countries are making use of the technology used for the Covid-19 passports/certificates to create Digital Identification for healthcare and other things (Activist Post).
Covid-19 should not have been labelled as a pandemic. It would not have looked like a pandemic if the number of deaths were not inflated by labelling people who died with Covid-19 as dying of Covid-19. If the elderly were not deliberately exposed to Covid-19 they would not have caught it. If they were not put on ventilators when they did need to be, more of them would have lived. If existing drugs such as hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin had be given to the most vulnerable many of them could have lived. If they were not put on end-of-life drugs such as Midazolam more would have lived. The pandemic was staged. Governments boosted the numbers by their actions. Mainstream media created mass hysteria with their non-stop reporting and fearmongering. Many big businesses (big pharmaceutical companies in particular) made excessively high profits. The richest became richer while the majority became poorer.
Profits were a factor in creating the Covid-19 fiasco but it was not likely to be the only one. Governments have positioned themselves through the development of digital technology to monitor and control their citizens. They desperately need to preserve the core of the Covid-19 lie so that they can fully implement these systems. If the Covid-19 pandemic was caused by what should have been a relatively harmless virus, the next pandemic could also be triggered by almost any type of virus. Therefore, we could have another pandemic any time the authorities want one, we do not even need a new virus for that to happen.
People might want revenge or justice for the Covid-19 crimes committed by the people in positions of power. I believe the bigger priority is to simply just stop them. The people responsible for the suffering caused by the Covid-19 responses and the jabs need to be removed from any positions of power permanently. The corrupt systems that put these people into the positions of power that they hold, need to be radically changed. This needs to be done on a global scale. If nothing is done, history will repeat and it will happen soon. For example the war in Ukraine, Governments and mainstream media are repeating the same strategies of fearmongering through lies, removal of free speech, and transfer of wealth as they did with Covid-19. This should not surprise anyone because it is being perpetrated by mostly the same people.
My Other Covid-19 Posts
I have written several posts relating to Covid-19. Below are the links to these posts. The posts below elaborate on several of the topics more briefly discussed in this post.
Covid-19 – Part 1: Identifying the threat
Covid-19 – Part 2: We live in a fragile world
Covid-19 – Part 3: Predicting the impact economic forces will have on prices of goods and services
Covid-19 – Part 4: Government Intervention
Covid-19 – Part 5: Possible impact of Government Intervention on the economy
Covid-19 – Part 6: Expected Social Costs
Covid-19 – Part 7: Winners and Losers
Covid-19 – Part 8: The road ahead
Summary of Spectrumecons Covid-19 Series
My Concerns about the Covid-19 Vaccines
Summary of the Vaccine Death Report
The fall of Australia plus my experience prior to the fall
Covid-19 Assault: Have the Establishment made the Right Moves? (Part 1)
Covid-19 Assault: Have the Establishment made the Right Moves? (Part 2)
Covid-19 Assault: Have the Establishment made the Right Moves? (Part 3)
More posts
If you want to read any of my other posts, you can click on the links below. These links will lead you to posts containing my collection of works. These 'Collection of Works' posts have been updated to contain links to the Hive versions of my posts.
Hive: Future of Social Media
Spectrumecons on the Hive blockchain
