Yeah. I would think that as the situation develops, a new ecological norm would develop, and we would reorganize our agricultural system accordingly. Of course, in the meantime, it would be no picnic.
The dangers of ideology is a special interest of the philosopher Zizec. I think he makes a strong case that ideology is inherently dangerous. Of course, he's drawing on Lacan, who, in turn, drew on Heidegger. The irony of that, of course, is that Heidegger, while refuting Metaphysics based ideological systems, was himself captured by the ideology of Naziism. Which just goes to show, I suppose, that ideology is a really seductive thing. Today I posted a brief essay that is somewhat relevant to this subject, if you're interested: [https://steemit.com/nietzche/@pjcomposer/an-introduction-to-moral-ecology] And I would agree that ideology is a dangerous thing to play with. It casts things in black and white terms, and if you can identify someone as evil, you can easily justify doing horrible things to them. I've noticed that tendency within myself, and it's very clear to see in the Antifa movement, for example.
But I still maintain that the future is specifically religious for one simple reason: only religious people are having children. Secular 1st world people are having 2 children, 1 child, or no children. Highly religious people of all stripes are having 3 or more. The likelihood of a child who grows up in a religious household adopting that religion is very high. So the future looks pretty religious to me. That's not necessarily a negative thing, provided we can tame religion, and make it compatible with natural law norms. If we can't, then that's a problem.
RE: From the Sun to the Earth; A Report on Weather in the Grand Solar Minimum, May 18, 2018 by Freddie Thornton