I laid out dozens of scriptures and asked you to show me why they don't say what they plainly say. Should I write those scriptures out again?
You keep bringing up the point that I didn't circumsize my three some as a rebellion against God. If I believe that Circumcision in the flesh is no longer required for Christians today in the New Covenant, how is that being in rebellion towards God? I've listed the verses that inform my understanding. I then asked you to show me through exegesis on how I am misunderstanding those scriptures. That doesn't sound like open rebellion to me. If I believed physical circumcision is still for today and refused to circumsize my son's, then that would be open rebellion.
I am asking you to change my mind if I am wrong. Show me how to properly interpret the writings in the New Testament that clearly teach a spiritualization of Circumcision as being done in the heart by the Spirit, aka, the new birth, born again, new creature?
RE: Contending for the Faith: part 1 of ?