Thanks for your feedback @hivewatchers. I have created several articles with AI. Unfortunately, I only remembered to decline the rewards for two publications. Unfortunately, this is no longer possible in retrospect. Another mistake was that I didn't clearly declare it as AI, which I have now made up for afterwards. I certainly didn't want to violate any guidelines. Rather, I wanted to test the extent to which AI is able to create simple structured content for wiki articles. It's not about creativity, but about emotionless content without personal opinions. I think AI can be used wonderfully for such things today. If you like, you can read my post on my main account @vanje. There I described what test I did and with what intention. I would also like to mention that I support their action and will continue to do so, even though I am regularly downvoted by endhivewatchers. I hope I didn't end up on the blacklist.
Edit: I have given it some more thought. First of all, I adapted the prompt for creating wiki articles so that a note appears at the end of a post to indicate that the wiki article was created with AI and checked manually. However, I see a problem in the motivation of potential article creators. If I tell them that they should refuse a reward, they probably won't make the effort. Perhaps it would actually be better not to pursue the project any further?
RE: The Problem with `<details>` Tags in Hive Posts (AI-generated)