a-non-e-moose

"...that force would be me..." I take your point. Though it may be a bit of hair splitting over whats 'natural' or not, I'd say that such requires a similar exertion of this somewhat transcendent

Agreed. Whether truths are accesible, it seems to me a healthy exercise of the mind to try and get at them nonetheless. Not only that, but the pursuit alone can be useful. We see such in science. Though

Some might say that the entire universe is in the mind of the beholder. Regardless, wisdom is indeed elusive from my estimation. Nice post.

What is this supposed to mean, if anything?

It's cool that a chat was finally implemented, I had been groaning about the unused memo keys for some time. Hopefully encryption is implemented. I may try it out, but it's saying something about needing

Most places are, and last I checked the numbers are actually looking heartening for once. I'm just extra cautious because I have a plethora of medical conditions and missing organs. I haven't set foot

It's a somewhat alluring concept for sure. A nukeless world is a safer world, and who doesn't want to live in a safer world? Even that minute mote of bias may be considerably influential. Much luck to

In the light of modern cryptography these sorts of utilities could certainly be effectively deployed without compromising privacy, but as you mentioned in a lot of ways that ship has already sailed with

😂

The internet seems far from the end-all and be-all of the means of production to me. The information age is based on the immaterial, but the material inevitably continues to exist and have dominant influence

That doesn't seem like much more than a test of anything but Google's patience or capacity for censorship to me. But those mathematical models aren't for testing out conspiracy theories either anyway (just

I think it's possible for a building not to be obliterated though near a large explosion. The number of factors involved is immense, and the system is chaotic as it nearly always is. Rare, unexpected,

"...that is just an artificial perception of meaningless marks on rocks..." Perhaps. Various geologic factors could raise or lower whatever the mark is being made on over time, via subduction

"If people reacted only to the truth, to the 'facts,' or to reality, then we would probably live in a perfect world where there is no failure or error." Or perhaps we would be paralyzed, finding

I like the way you think.

"As far as the equations themselves, I have no idea what they show, and given that I had to do some applied maths courses as part of my education, I suspect that 99.0% of people globally would find

I think I see what you're saying here. I can buy that the 'official story' is just a lie, given of the propensity for lying that people have. In fact that longer paper I shared gives something of a

I suspect your series of photographs is in no way a precise measurement, unless you happen to be employing surveying techniques. Whatever the case, even were it an exercise in geometry, that is not an

That's an infinite percent increase, are you sure it isn't a bit over generous? 😉

This concern with cancer records seems misplaced to me. There are many ways cancer is caused, not only by ionizing radiation. Some types of non ionizing radiation cause cancer, as well as chemical carcinogens,