complexring

There are quite a few fundamental reasons why division by 0 is undefined. The first is to consider the graph of the function y = 1/x. If we consider the limit from the right hand side (positive real numbers)

If you don't like the direction the platform is going, buy more steem and power up and join the fight. If you don't care ...

I fail to see what is wrong with what she claims to have been taught. 1 / 0 is indeed undefined. What else would it be?

... Might is simply reality.

No. Im saying the law applies because the government has the power to enforce it. I brought this up earlier ... are you agreeing with the old adage that "might makes right"? Edit: forgot the

I mean, if youre looking for legal argumentation that jurisdiction is a thing, its right there in the constitution. So ... the State has jurisdiction because the constitution says that the State has power?

No, im saying that whether or not the law applies to a specific circumstance or person can only be established with legal argumentation. Not with evidence. You might not think this is the way it ought

So i could cite laws and court decisions, but that would just be more law (which you don't think applies). You can cite laws, if you want, and I would say that a citation of a law is a legal opinion, and

Or is your point that no law applies to anyone? because 'prove it'. Maybe it is. Because if it is, thats an interesting theory. And a great way to end up in prison if you ever use it in your own defense.

It isn't a fact at all, which is why i used quotes around the word 'fact'. OK, sure. but if i ask you the same question about demonstrating the applicability of a law, there is no way to prove or disprove

not in the US. Or any jurisdiction ive ever heard of. I have to ask... what kind of 'evidence' could there ever be to establish the 'fact' that a law, any law, was applicable to a person or circumstance.

How is applicability of the law a matter of law? Applicability, whether or not exists, is a matter of fact.

The question is getting at an essential element of the charge, i.e. applicability of the law or statute. How can someone be said to violate a code if the code does not apply? As such, it is essential to

Provide the evidence that proves the claim that these laws are applicable.

I like how you used the opportunity to respond to my questions. /end sarcasm

Patrick or Stephen Dai, or whomever he is, scammed the BitBay. Only 51% to investors. Smart money is not buying this (unless you're a part of the BobSurplus crew).

Martin Luther removed whole books of the Bible because they didn't jive with his viewpoint.

I hardly think that paying for AWS or any other servers or amassing the technical skills necessary to mine (in whatever way that is possible) comes at no cost ... In fact, it's quite risky as there is

Subjective value is precisely that.

Due to nested comment limitations, putting this here. I don't use other people's created tools for indicators. Yes, we're still on lower volume, but the supply availability on the order books is not available